|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,653 Likes: 1
Working on the ultimate question
|
|
Working on the ultimate question
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,653 Likes: 1 |
Is there a difference between the SB3 and Transporter a resounding yes as far as my ears are concerned the bass is better and the sound stage is greatly improved and as I`ve said to me it is better than the 800, plus the whole convenience of SC7, but I`ve still kept the 800 V3 and I`m in the process of ordering an 808.2i (I need the Pre-Amp section). This suggests the jitter of the Transporter is lower than the SB. When we were originally experimenting with the original SB a few years ago we found that putting the SB through a de-jitter device gave the improvements you describe. Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 262
Hitchhiker
|
|
Hitchhiker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 262 |
I've experimented with an SB2 and GaryG's Big Ben and there was a definite improvement. There is also an improvement with my current SB3 -> 518 than the bare SB3.
I've not heard a transporter yet, but I have heard Patrick Dixon's SB+ and again on digital only there was an improvement with the SB+ over the SB2 into a 566.20
I have also got a modded SB2 with a seperate regulator supplying the power to the SPDIF circuit. I should really compare the following:-
(SB2 + SPDIF regulator) v SB3 v SB3 + 518 v (SB2 + SPDIF regulator + 518)
I also have a fully regulated linear PSU as well, so could throw that into the mix as well.
Alternatively I could just go and buy a Transporter (or SB+)!
The biggest difference we noted when testing at GaryG's was the attack of the notes.
Mr Perceptive
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88
Don't Panic!
|
|
Don't Panic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88 |
Mr P, what processor (or DAC) and speakers are you using?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,816 Likes: 87
President of the Imperial Galactic Government
|
|
President of the Imperial Galactic Government
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,816 Likes: 87 |
I think Patrick Dixon (a.k.a the bloke that mods the SB+) does publish his jitter and noise improvement data I think on his www. Worth a look as it does tend to back why there would/should/could be an improvement over standard SB3.
Rgds, Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 262
Hitchhiker
|
|
Hitchhiker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 262 |
Virus Killer
568.2 -> 557 -> Shahinian Arcs
though the testing at GaryG's was with his Wadia Processor -> Krells -> Kef Reference Speakers and the testing at Patrick's was with a 566.20 -> Patrick's Own Amplifier -> Linn Isobarik's (though have to say that the 566.20 was soundly beaten by Patrick's internal DACs in the SB+)
Mr Perceptive
Last edited by Mr Perceptive; 2008-03-06 12:02. Reason: more info + bad spelling!
|
|
|
|
Forums18
Topics31,245
Posts297,394
Members5,503
| |
Most Online4,788 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|