|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 416
Hitchhiker
|
|
Hitchhiker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 416 |
An additional note on the functionality/value of the AA -- it serves as a preamp/volume control with pure analog inputs as well as several digital inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88
Don't Panic!
|
|
Don't Panic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88 |
JK. I have always felt that for digital out, there can't be much in it. For analogue, a number of people have said that the 861 sounds better and it makes complete sense that the 861 *should* be better. I did think that the DACs/output stages were different though.
Something Bob Stuart said in one of his video interviews suggests to me that it's the cleanliness of circuitry in the 861 that makes all of the difference, but who knows!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,606
Great Green Arkleseizure
|
|
Great Green Arkleseizure
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,606 |
VK: The DACs are the same, but that does not mean the analog output stages are the same As for digital out, I think it would be a tough call 'tween the 861 and G68 but not having opportunity to compare them I'm really just guessing.
Surround Music Fan/Computer Geek/Curmudgeon in training. --- 861v4, HD621, Panasonic BD-P55K, Toshiba HD-A35, Oppo HD990, Dish Network 622, Pioneer DV-668AV-S w/ DVD Upgrades mod, EW Fontaine II (x5), Velodyne DD-15 (x2), Seymour AV Ice blocks (x7)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88
Don't Panic!
|
|
Don't Panic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88 |
Originally posted by John Kotches: The DACs are the same, but that does not mean the analog output stages are the same Yeah yeah. I got that!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 485
Paranoid android
|
|
Paranoid android
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 485 |
Originally posted by VirusKiller: Are we talking analogue outputs here? Yup. The DACs are the same, but that does not mean the analog output stages are the same Amen to that  ..and that is the big difference between 861 and G68 in that regard- of course I have to add this is a subjective hobby-your ears/hearing may vary!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,140 Likes: 24
Hooloovoo
|
|
Hooloovoo
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,140 Likes: 24 |
So what is the point of an 861 v G68 if using DSP speakers with their own DACs/output stages? We established in an earlier thread that the digital processing software was the same.
In the spirit of Spinaltap, I would like to confirm that I am not involved in the corrupt theft of a global sport.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88
Don't Panic!
|
|
Don't Panic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88 |
Originally posted by gianni: So what is the point of an 861 v G68 if using DSP speakers with their own DACs/output stages? We established in an earlier thread that the digital processing software was the same. Originally posted by John Kotches: The 861 has greater flexibility and obviously upgradability is in 861s favor.
|
|
|
|
Forums18
Topics31,231
Posts297,334
Members5,503
| |
Most Online4,788 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|