Originally posted by JerryL:
I agree that its best to get to the common standard LPCM. But is there any value in having Meridian do their own DTS Master or Dolby True HD decoding? I mean they wrote their own decoding for DD/DTS and claim this produced some benefits right? In a product like the 861, bragging rights are important.
If we're talking about DTS Master Audio and Dolby TrueHD I'm not going to agree with you. In a properly functioning lossless decoder all the results should (by definition) be identical.
The value add is in what happens
after the decode.
Thanks for the info guys- I was confused because I have read in passing that 1.1 can transmit it/ you need 1.3. Can you pass 1080P/30/24 over 1.2? If yes then I vote for 1.2 now. If no then I vote to build more future proofing into it.
1080p (up to 60Hz) is within spec for 1.1. 1.2 added in support for additional PC based changes. 1.2a added in SA-CD support. 1.3 adds deep color and bitstream transfers of DD+, DTS-HD, Dolby True HD and DTS-HD Master Audio.
btw- would our processors be able to handle the LPCM streams?
Yes. This is really no different than the MHR streams that come down the cable today.
It would seem that Dolby True HD is 96/24 and I think our processors can handle this. Am I correct?
Dolby TrueHD maxes out at 24/192K. To date; all of the TrueHD tracks have been 48kHz. I don't know that there's a rush out of Hollywood to implement 96K sampling.
Yes, the processors (at least current models) can handle and process 24/96K -- they do that with 96K DVD-Audio discs. Beyond 24/96K; I have reservations.
Another question is would Meridian be able to take in HDMI 1.x @ full resolution, process it, and then output it in MHR to digital speakers at 96/24 or better? I would hope so but I remember we just had some discussion here where many thought this would be an uphill battle. So if thats the case I am left to ask, whats the point?
It is too soon to tell.