Thanks for your thoughts, tips and comments everyone.

Am all for artists getting their fair share of the revenues - and gather that Tidal is better than most in this regard.

I'd reckon that Tidal works out everything, including the artist's cut, in its base currency of the $ - and the £1 for $1 pricing (or closer to this than the prevailing exchange rate for bigger-ticket items) is just a common practice among many firms. While the market seems to bear it for the likes of buying a download from Apple, I'm thinking there might be a little more price sensitivity for Tidal's £240/year - which might hold back take-up and thus dampen the prospective revenue for Tidal and for artists.

| Music: NAS/Squeezebox Touch & Linn Axis/562V.2 -> DSP5200s
| Movies: G98DH -> 568.2MM -> DSP7000s, DSP5200HC, DSP5000C x2 rears, M2500, DVDO iScan VP50, LG 60"
| Humax FreeSat distributed to Cinema + two TVs