So we can expect that soon? Looking at the general speed of Sooloos updates I would not be holding my breath, or maybe Meridian could post here and let its customers know
It is not true that QNAP have withdrawn the 4.2.0 firmware as I obtained it from them. However, you do have to ask nicely and sign your life away as their updates are to deal with security as well as other issues and they want to protect themselves from what I would regard as stupid and vexatious complaints if something went wrong. Of course, if you use your NAS just for Sooloos it will be behind your router and firewall etc. so the risks are small and certainly don't worry me.
For the x53A QNAPs I have the 4.2.0 firmware and, with an appropriate PM to preserve QNAPs proprietorial rights, I am sure I can pass it to you.
As I posted recently, I am unclear whether a simple change of file name would allow that firmware to be used with other QNAP x86 NASes.
Last edited by Longitude0; 2017-03-1319:44. Reason: Qualified Firmware for QNAP NASes only
I am sorry to have to admit that for many English people of my age Docker either means a person who works in a shipping port or a very rich couple (Sir Bernard and Lady Docker) who, in the 1950s, got up to the kind of tasteless excess that these days are more the territory of Russian oligarchs or others who think it is wonderful to be vulgar.
Since you mentioned Docker yesterday I have looked it up and have learned that it is some type of software packaging standard (I think) that allows conforming software to be transferred easily from one type of OS to another. Is my limited investigation and conclusion broadly correct?
Since you mentioned Docker yesterday I have looked it up and have learned that it is some type of software packaging standard (I think) that allows conforming software to be transferred easily from one type of OS to another. Is my limited investigation and conclusion broadly correct?
Yes, that's correct.
What distinguishes Docker from, say, the QPKG format is that there is a Docker engine that run Docker containers (in which Sooloos core would be packaged). These containers are isolated from the system (QNAP QTS) on which they run and self-contained in that they include the application (Sooloos core in this case) and all the required underlying libraries, correct operating system versions and settings, etc. Almost but not quite like a virtual machine would be.
Sadly I see no 'Sooloos only' option - It kind of needs things like 'the NAS' working
i.e. Rebuild of RAID, addition / swapping / replacement of drives, new drive compatibility, remote administration, etc...
Running into problems fixed by later versions isn't going to get much sympathy/support from QNAP
Originally Posted by Longitude0
As I posted recently, I am unclear whether a simple change of file name would allow that firmware to be used with other QNAP x86 NASes.
Since the QNAP updates include the kernel, installing an antique version of the kernel that does not include drivers to talk to the disk / network / hardware platform, that may not be 'good?'
Any protection in the updates to prevent ending up with a brick, may not help if you've tampered with the update.
I downloaded and installed 4.2.0 to my QNAP and rebooted the C15. The C15 now sees the QNAP storage on the Device Manager but doesn't Retrieve settings for some reason. Back to square one.
Would it be a good idea to re-install Sooloos core to the QNAP? Has anyone else had this problem?
Regards Paul
C15, QNAP TS-453A, Synthesis A100T Tube amp with onboard DAC, Triangle Antal Anniversary Edition