|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,013 Likes: 1
Vogon Civil Servant
|
|
Vogon Civil Servant
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,013 Likes: 1 |
I'd always assumed so.
If one had a 5.x system I'd not have suggested the 568.1. Having listened to Trifield on a 5.1 system I'd suggest the rears are not adding a lot.
Sooloos, Roon, G series (with LPS upgrade), 800 series (with LPS upgrade), HD621, AC200, Prime and PS, DSPs old and new.
Purdeys, Moke, Leica, 'Blad. Only the best.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 485
Paranoid android
|
|
Paranoid android
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 485 |
Having played with 5000HC/5200HC/5500HC on legacy mains (7000/8000).. I would opt for 5500HC otherwise use phantom center.
IMHO based on my experience of course..
regards,
Kishore
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,868 Likes: 13
Knows where his towel is
|
|
Knows where his towel is
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,868 Likes: 13 |
I agree with MI' about the use of the full surround set for Trifield, but I presume that where the processor is set up for only 3 speakers (LCR), then it will adjust the sound field to compensate for the lack of rears. How the sound field is adjusted I have no idea. However no "sound" is thrown away is the important point. With Trifield and rears for music, the amount fed to rears varies. Regards I
Under review
|
|
|
|
Forums18
Topics31,204
Posts297,198
Members5,503
| |
Most Online4,788
May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
Google Search
|
Meridian Systems
|
Meridian Streaming
|
Restaurant
|
WiKi
|
Duncan's Meridian Info
|
Board Rules
|
Restaurant Rules
