Originally Posted by Anthony-Howard
If so have I been misled as I was under the impression that 192/24 was inferior to 96/24 and that as such when the temporal information of MQA was included in the codec that 96/24 would still be the superior format.
I cannot imagine why anyone would say that 192/24 is inferior to 96/24 (all other variables equal). The issue has always been whether the quite significant additional cost of implementing it provided any audible or functional advantage.

MQA is certainly something that creates inequality in the set of variables. smile


Kal Rubinson
"Music in the Round"
Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile