|
Working on the ultimate question
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,351 Likes: 1 |
I thought it was because they make money selling storage servers that 192/24 is superior  The explanations are getting clearer and more people seem to be catching on that this is a superior way to digitize and stream audio with superior fidelity. Time will tell how many systems this will positively affect but they are certainly making the ceiling higher! The authentication part of MQA is highly appreciated too, in the age of buying files and streaming over the internet. Like digital signing of software packages it confirms the provenance of the audio file.
Primary: 818v3+ID41, M6 stereo pair, M SpeakerLink cabling, Sonos+96kHz Cullen, silver DSW HT: Marantz prepro, 271, DSP3300, 8K SE FL/FR pair, DSP M6x2, DSP320x4 (ceiling), black DSW, 520 RL/RR rear in-walls Living Room: G65, 640 L/R in-walls, UHD722, MS600 Vac. Home: G61, HD621, 4xDSP3100, DSP3100HC MDMS:NUC/ROCK+TrueNAS Core 12.0 ZFS file server
|