I think there are a ton of analog questions.

I would look for clarification that given the new MQA tech is all the more sensitive, time alignment at certain frequencies is all the more important. Thus why the larger SE DSP loudspeakers sound better? If in the analog environment, one can apply the same level of channel separation at the DSP level, they should see similar results?

The D/A processors in the new SE's push the upper limit's of oversampling. Are these traditional processors or has there been modification to these that is proprietary to M?

What part of the food chain in MQA does M look at as proprietary and what do they see as being available to other manufacturers.

As for where the MQA process occurs and whether its hardware vs software? Gives and takes of each option? Further, where in the chain, does one get the best sound quality?

I ask all this as I think broad industry adoption is the only way this is accepted.

Any reason to believe that MQA won't end up on Sooloos?


Last edited by Yetis; 2014-12-22 17:49. Reason: Make it readable..
Primary: MD600, MS200 (SpeakerLink to AES), Trinnov ST-2, Ayre V6-xe, Salk SS8 3x LRC.
Secondary: MC600 (whole house).
Zone one: 568.2, G57, MS200, Spatial Hologram M2SE.
Zone 2-6 (Awaiting assignment).