Originally Posted by ChrisLayerUK
If it doesn't improve sound, they don't bother
The one and only reason why Meridian may not bother with DSD is probably license fees (Sony) and the need to convert to PCM anyway in order to use their current DSP structure (like so many use for x-over or room correction, also brought up as a point in the video I linked above) unable to process DSD "analogue like" digital signals natively.

However, I second the thought that most often new masters are created. So the great DSD sound may come from a better master used or remixed. However, that is why I want DSD in Meridian gear. I simple want all great formats that deliver the best, not necessarily a selection of formats. In that respect I do not care, if PCM 96/192 or DSD is better, I just want all the good and great stuff smile

Source: Playback Designs

[Linked Image from playbackdesigns.com]

[Linked Image from playbackdesigns.com]

[Linked Image from playbackdesigns.com]

Cheers, Andreas
My Meridian history 565/519 (1996), 861 (2000), to G68ADV, to 561 today, tri-axial cardioid studio monitors, self build acoustic measures, ceiling sails, corner bass traps, trial Helmholtz resonator, REW, Apple (TV, Mac, IPAD), SBT, Calman