As said, this is not the right place to discuss it, but I sometimes feel we are all not really honest to ourselves. Why do we debate about something more when it is fresh, true for two weeks and do not mind, if our investments get slashed in half a year later with a new version, especially if you have a hobby wallet instead of unlimited resources. Is that "fraction in time" to just make that one next step so important? I'm sure we see "soon" from M some sort of Meridian Wireless SpeakerLink. All of a sudden people will discover that high bandwidth FM transmission and high precision re-syncing/clocking will lead to fantastic Jitter values. One day, one day, Meridian may let you use two to four rear speakers for Stereo as a Meridian Digital Bass array (digital instead of double). Who knows what shows up. But again, let's put this aside.

I think it is truly amazing how much Meridian offers in the form of upgrades, you can almost always hop back on the train.

What I personally cannot understand, that people get slammed in discussions as they insist that Meridian is supposed to use off the shelve drivers, true fans reply, no, it is customized and top notch, and the same people cheers now for a beryllium tweeter. Truly amazing...


Cheers, Andreas
My Meridian history 565/519 (1996), 861 (2000), to G68ADV, to 561 today, tri-axial cardioid studio monitors, self build acoustic measures, ceiling sails, corner bass traps, trial Helmholtz resonator, REW, Apple (TV, Mac, IPAD), SBT, Calman