logo

Google Search  |  Meridian Systems  |  Meridian Streaming  |  Restaurant  |  WiKi  |  Duncan's Meridian Info  |  Board Rules  |  Restaurant Rules
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rating: 5
Page 6 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,569
Likes: 13
President of the Imperial Galactic Government
President of the Imperial Galactic Government
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,569
Likes: 13
I can't remember in what thread this was covered but an article was linked to which discussed the technical issues for and against higher sample rates.
The marketing men do like to push bigger numbers means better and on the surface it seems logical but apparently things are not that simple.
Meridian down sample to 96 KHz anyway and, as I understand it, there is nothing to gain going higher, in fact this can degrade the sound.

I am certain someone will point us in the relevant direction, perhaps I need to re read this. Chris smile


No 18 in the Hall of fame smile I have simple tastes; I am content to settle for the best:
GIK monster bass panels, rear wall. QNAP TVS 471i3. Roon into DSP5200SE via 210/ 218 zone... Explorer 2. Bluesound Pulse 2, Mini & Flex. 596v1, 518, Foxsat HD, Sony BDP, Pioneer 5090, 2 Chromecast's for LRB videos. MS200 to F80 for a Roon zone

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 18
Paranoid android
Paranoid android
Online: Content
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 18
An interesting read

Coding High Quality Digital Audio by Bob Stuart

TL;DR

This conclusion has the following obvious implications:
� The CD channel with 44.1kHz 16-bit coding (even with noise shaping to extend the resolution) is inadequate
� Even 48kHz sampling is not quite high enough
� Sampling at 88.2kHz or 96kHz is too high, and therefore wasteful of data
� The use of sampling rates above 96kHz to convey a wider audio bandwidth cannot currently be justified

Cheers
Greg


M owner since '97
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733
Likes: 88
Don't Panic!
Don't Panic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733
Likes: 88
Originally Posted by Greg Wright
This conclusion has the following obvious implications:
� The CD channel with 44.1kHz 16-bit coding (even with noise shaping to extend the resolution) is inadequate
� Even 48kHz sampling is not quite high enough
� Sampling at 88.2kHz or 96kHz is too high, and therefore wasteful of data
� The use of sampling rates above 96kHz to convey a wider audio bandwidth cannot currently be justified
Assuming everything in the recording and mastering chain is done correctly.


Roon Developer and ex-moderator of this Forum
I am #25 in the HH1 photo of fame.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 55
Knows where his towel is
Knows where his towel is
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 55
Originally Posted by Greg Wright
This conclusion has the following obvious implications:
� The CD channel with 44.1kHz 16-bit coding (even with noise shaping to extend the resolution) is inadequate
� Even 48kHz sampling is not quite high enough
� Sampling at 88.2kHz or 96kHz is too high, and therefore wasteful of data
� The use of sampling rates above 96kHz to convey a wider audio bandwidth cannot currently be justified

You left out the bit depth part ~ 24 bits not needed for replay channels....

Originally Posted by Bob Stuart
It is suggested that a channel that attains audible transparency will be equivalent to a PCM channel that uses:
� 58kHz sampling rate,
and
� 14-bit representation with appropriate noise shaping,
or
� 20-bit representation in a flat noise floor, i.e. a �rectangular� channel.

Last edited by Syles; 2013-03-12 21:00. Reason: quote added
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
Working on the ultimate question
Working on the ultimate question
Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
Had my 861 upgraded this week. Still getting my head around sound differences, recognizing the need to let the unit burn-in and that I will probably need to rerun room correction (as opposed to just copying in the v6 settings), but everything works fine. low bass seems better, but mid-bass worse - again, probably just need to rerun RC. No problems with ID41.

Biggest pain was probably rebulding the v8 Mconfig profile. I just don't go in there frequently enough for there not to be a new learning curve each time. But it's done.

One thing I did find was that the weight balance in the unit has shifted due to the additional weight of the LPS - took me by surprise when lifting the unit and expecting the same rear-inclined weight balance. I almost dropped the damn thing.

Last edited by Simon; 2013-03-13 00:45.

My Kit: 861v8+ID41, 800v4, UHD722, MD600, MS600, MS200, Oppo BDP-203, Genesis 201, Genesis 350 SE, Genesis S4-8 Sub, BG 520i, VTL MB450 II, Krell Showcase 7, Genesis 928 Subs, Danley DTS10 sub, SVS Ultra 16 subs.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
Working on the ultimate question
Working on the ultimate question
Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
Burn-in complete and room correction rerun. Upgrade, inclusive of ID41, appears to be quite worthwhile. As others have noted, clarity is improved, as is low bass. The bass balance change I noted before has been largely remedied by rerunning room correction, although I have found it necessary to back down a bit on the amp that runs the bass towers in my main speakers. I also find, curiously, the need to select a slightly higher width setting on Trifield (1.3 rather than 1.1). Can't really explain that one.

The best barometer for me for an upgrade is to play something I'm familiar with, think I hear something amiss with a tweeter in one of the mains, only to realize it's a recording flaw I've never heard befor. This has happened twice today.


My Kit: 861v8+ID41, 800v4, UHD722, MD600, MS600, MS200, Oppo BDP-203, Genesis 201, Genesis 350 SE, Genesis S4-8 Sub, BG 520i, VTL MB450 II, Krell Showcase 7, Genesis 928 Subs, Danley DTS10 sub, SVS Ultra 16 subs.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 513
Likes: 1
Paranoid android
Paranoid android
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 513
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Simon
Originally Posted by Dollar2
I loaded my filters from MRC without re-running it.
Curious how you were able to do this?
Actually, for this procedure, I just entered the filters manually in the room correction tab because I just wanted a rough pallet with the new unit. I have followed the procedure in the wiki after I've actually run the MRC routine and it works like a champ.


Regards,
Bill

Theater: 861v8+ID41, 218, (2) DSP8KSEs, DSP7200VCSE, (2) DSP5200s, Marantz UD9004, (2) JL Audio F113s, Roon
Whole House: 218s, DSP520s, DSP 320s, Roon
Office: 218, DSP3200s, Roon
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 513
Likes: 1
Paranoid android
Paranoid android
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 513
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Simon
The best barometer for me for an upgrade is to play something I'm familiar with, think I hear something amiss with a tweeter in one of the mains, only to realize it's a recording flaw I've never heard befor. This has happened twice today.
I can appreciate moments like that.


Regards,
Bill

Theater: 861v8+ID41, 218, (2) DSP8KSEs, DSP7200VCSE, (2) DSP5200s, Marantz UD9004, (2) JL Audio F113s, Roon
Whole House: 218s, DSP520s, DSP 320s, Roon
Office: 218, DSP3200s, Roon
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 4
Senior Shouting Officer
Senior Shouting Officer
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 4
Just burning in and getting used to the v8 upgrade, still some tweaking need with Movie sound (I think the re-run MRC didn't bring the best results). Voices have a tonal accuracy and weight that seems much improved even when using the Centre Elevation feature. Already this seems a very worthy upgrade to me.

Music is stunning, as others have said. Poor recordings need some help but great recordings have incredible grip and presence possibly aided by the new tweeters in 7200.2s/HC. Another reason why I want Lossless 5.1 in my Sooloos System.

The other real bonus for me was the surprising sound quality from my v4 and 'recycled' ID40 with DSP5000s. In a different, smaller room but, really enjoyable and a great use of resources. Thank You M!

An especially BIG Thank You to Rick and all at Audio Images for an exemplary install. 'Premium' in every way possible.

M


Mostly harmless. Comfortably numb.
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 5
Hitchhiker
Hitchhiker
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 5
DS from Natural Sound, Framingham installed the hardware and firmware upgrades to our 861 (now v8) and 7200s (now .2) yesterday. All went smoothly. Still within burn-in period, but can easily hear significant improvement. Warmer, more musical and natural, great separation between instruments/performers. One minor but cool feature on the 7200.2's - upon powerup, the display first shows "Meridian" for a few seconds, then "7200.2" for a few, then normal source and volume indications.



Main: 861v8, 818v3, 8000XE, 7200HCUSE, 7200.2, Roon Nucleus+, Shunyata Everest w/ Sigma XC and Alpha NR's, HD621, Oppo 103D, Panasonic P60ZT60 plasma. RJ45 switch on master SpeakerLink lines to select 861 or 818, Etherregen & ENO AG feeding the 818, M-Links.
Room #2: 5200.2s from M218.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 46
Mostly harmless
Mostly harmless
Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 46
What is the center elevation feature? I have my center on the floor below my screen, so I'd love to make the center sound like it is in the center of the screen - I hear trinnov can do that.


Oh, that a man's reach should exceed his grasp.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 485
Paranoid android
Paranoid android
Offline
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 485

You can buy Meridian Speakers and get center elevation. Try Google smile

Link for a review here


Page 6 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Moderated by  Carl, Duncs, ncpl 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (Floris), 641 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Kiran1103, Tony999, PhilP, Grover, Humberto
5,503 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
VirusKiller 12,733
ncpl 8,816
Carl 8,506
Fiddler 8,364
Ian 7,950
Forum Statistics
Forums18
Topics31,225
Posts297,300
Members5,503
Most Online4,788
May 22nd, 2026
Meridian  |  Media Centre  |  Support  |  Firmware Release Notes  |  RSS Systems  |  RSS Streaming  |  RSS Restaurant

Website Provided by Mr Tech Guy - Resolute Audio Visual Limited © 2026

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Release build 20251126)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.5.12 Page Time: 0.082s Queries: 40 (0.054s) Memory: 0.8941 MB (Peak: 2.2165 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-10-24 09:59:05 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS