Why might an MS600 sound better than an MC200??...................and most that have compared them think that the MS600 sounds better???

It essentially comes down to lower RFI / EMI levels within the MS600.......as it doesn't have a spinning drive or as many other RFI Generating components within it as the MC200

It remains likely that it is the RFI that is causing the Pollution of the Master Clock within the MC200 and therefore creating higher levels of Jitter on the MC200 Outputs


RFI is a well known side effect of moving Data around at Mega and Gigahertz levels.........and therefore RFI is a well known issue on Gigabit Networks

Is it not reasonable to assume that at least some of these high RFI Levels is finding its way into our Audio Endpoints from the Network Cabling...........and that the RFI could contribute to Jitter on the Digital Outs and internal transfers of PCM Data???

-