Again I said, I suspect, geesh. I'm used to well thought out logial ways of doing something and I assumed ADA would do such a thing (been around Meridian too long I guess). I'm not going to read the manual. I said I SUSPECT that a TEQ-4 might work in tandem with Mark-IV (which would be IDEAL). If ADA MUST resample everything to get it all to work, I don't think it's an ideal design (because they don't have to). But if it resamples at a higher rate than the QSC it will certainly be better than that QSC box and if it does require resampling everything, yes he would need the TEQ-12 (with a ton of redundant hardware at $15,000 list).
This is not my way or Meridian way.
It's just logical sound ways of doing things.
EQ loops have been done before the Volume for 40 years.
Every time you add a box in analog you degrade it.
Resampling should be avoided when possible.
Downsampling should not happen at all.
Your system is only as good as the weakest link.
Sometimes less is more.
I won't let someone slam Meridian on false information.
I won't have someone tell me I have Nyquist wrong and then someone else tell me they successfully proved I was wrong.
I won't spend all this time and let someone come along and say it's a 5% tweak, Who's winning, a fanboy fued or pepsi vs coke. I spend too much time on this forum thread to let folks walk away thinking that. Some of these serious flaws.
I'm actually surprized this was not better moderated because it should of been split and the forum lacks moderation on the USA side. Sorry I just could not do it any more.
Topics should have been:
All Large vs Multiple Mono subs and it's effects on Directionality.
Managing multiple mono subs (if that is the direction you so desire)
A lesson in Nyquist theory.
But I suspect UK folks were overwhelmed by morning

I apoligize to any and all Professionals involved if Ken has mispresented things.