I don't know if Dennis knows how it's hooked up today and he may of not hooked it up that way. And he may not have known what he was replying too. If Dennis knows Ken is running ALL channels through the QSC and still thinks QSC won't do any harm he is absolutely dead wrong. If only the sub channel was passed through QCS 48Khz won't hurt. Ken didn't prove a thing here. And he either posted out of context that 48khz resampling is ok or he knew the context (all channels resampled) and he posted mis information. It took a few posts to convince Frank of that but he came around smile

But Dennis or who ever came to Ken's defense should know what the heck they are defending. But Ken has a butchered system. Who got it this final way I have no idea. And who know's Ken may not even be giving correct info. Making Dennis look bad. But someone dragged Dennis into this.

It does not have to be Meridian way to be right. I said numerous times all large vs Multiple Mono subs is a respectable debate.

But I think any respectible high end SSP vender would agree Ken's setup is far from optimal.

I suspect the TEQ-12 is targeted for non ADA processors and the TEQ-4 is designed to be an addon to the Mark-IV. So that way you don't have to resample ALL the main channels and still get complete EQ. If you can avoid resampling AT ALL you should. Let alone poorly.

And this is not George's camp. EvdBerg and Frank agree and I suspect many more. And it's not because they are Meridian huggers. I'm just too stupid to not let it slide.

- Fiddler (IMHO)

If you think listening to music is fun, try learning an instrument.
HT: G61RSL, 4x5K, 5.5KHC, 2xSC6000, Transporter, HD621, Philips BDP7501 4K, Tivo, 65" LG OLED 4K C6
Computer: Foobar2000, 5K, Mojo, HiFiMan HE1000 V2