|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,364 Likes: 2
President of the Imperial Galactic Government
|
|
President of the Imperial Galactic Government
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,364 Likes: 2 |
I'd like to chip in with some experience of using a dozen Blu-ray players with as many amps and processors over the last couple of years. I have an Oppo BDP83, owned a NuForce Oppo, and placed an early order for the BDP93. I also have a Denon A1UDCI, which is the best-sounding stock BD player, and an LG BH200, which is the worst-sounding. These presently feed LPCM to an 861V4 + HD621.
The big surprise has been that BD players differ almost as much as CD transports, even when playing over HDMI. The HD621 needs LPCM, and the Ayre and big Denon are intended to provide just that - as well as they can. I haven't heard the Ayre, but my money says that will be the best yet.
Reading the Stereophile teaser for the Ayre ("state of the art measurements") I think that review will be worth waiting for. Oppo seem to be the player of choice for HH'ers, but I think it still limits what you can achieve via an HD621. Something compromised like the Audiolab 8000AP processor seems to let jitter through like a seive, and shows up huge differences between say the Oppo and the Denon. The 621 narrows that gap effectively, but it still doesn't eliminate the differences between players, and you CAN do better than the stock Oppo. It's interesting to read someone who has tried so many players through an HD621, and has heard differences so clearly. There was an interesting discussion sometime ago asking whether it mattered what you put into an HD621, sound wise. I should try to dig it out.
Ex-moderator Sitting room: dCS Network Bridge, 818v3, HD621, 8kSE Library: dCS Rossini Apex DAC/Clock, Clearaudio Performance Wood, Audio Research PH2, Mjölnir KGST, Mjölnir PureBipolar SWMBO Room: 210, D33 Kitchen: Meridian MS200, Genelec 6010 actives Mobile: Audioquest DragonFly Copper, Sennheiser IE600 Desk: Merging Anubis Server: Roon/ROCK/NUC Headphones: Stax SR-X9000, Stax SR-007, Stax SR-404LE, Audeze LCD-X...
Oldest audio file: 1889 Edison cylinder
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9
Knows where his towel is
|
|
Knows where his towel is
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9 |
IMHO, as long as the HD621 needs LPCM audio, its going to be somewhat susceptible to jitter from the source (and maybe other unknown nasties that separate audio + video HDMI outputs may help to avoid). So I'm convinced that there's a place for a better BD player, even where only the HDMI output is used. Nick Yes, an interesting review of extensive experience. But why do you think that a twin output player will help cure problems for the HD621 in the light of what Joelc has writen: @ Asa, no, and likely for the same reasons that the Lumagen makes little/no difference in that ALL HDMI signals must contain a video stream -- albeit a "blank one"...that is, I could not tell the difference between splitting/not splitting the video audio/video stream...
Asa Post
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 337
Hitchhiker
|
|
Hitchhiker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 337 |
Just to be clear, I wouldn't recommend the Denon A1UD. The 3800 - yes, unhesitatingly, but not the A1. Although the A1 is better at everything, its not good enough to justify the premium, and the modified Oppos are better.
The truncation of SACD over HDMI is an unforgivable shortcoming for this sort of player as well.
Quite by coincidence, I just finished installing HW multi-region mods to both my Oppo and Denon yesterday. The Oppo mod was much easier than the Denon!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9
Knows where his towel is
|
|
Knows where his towel is
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9 |
But why do you think twin outputs will help with the HD621?
Asa Post
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9
Knows where his towel is
|
|
Knows where his towel is
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9 |
It looks as though anyone hoping to get a BDP 93EU before Christmas may be unlucky. The BBC have reported a theft of stock from Oppo Europe. Whether this is all or only some of the stock of 93EUs is not clear: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-11893522Ther are also reports that firmware problems have delayed general release in Europe.
Asa Post
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 337
Hitchhiker
|
|
Hitchhiker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 337 |
But why do you think twin outputs will help with the 621? My comment about twin outlets relates to players, not processors. It means the audio processor doesn't have to be connected to a video display or video processor, which is usually a bad thing. Nomatter how its done, digital video on HDMI seems to pollute everything it touches. I was playing with my HD621, and used its HDMI output to drive non-Meridian equipment. I found that the HD621 degraded the audio when it was switched on, but out of the audio chain, for example when using SPDIF directly from the player. It made my Sony 9100 sound "hashy" at the top-end; not very nice. I also found that unplugging TVs, projectors and video processors improves SQ in conventional AV systems that are hooked-up with HDMI. Digital video and audio really don't mix to my mind - I think Meridian got that one right. Twin outlets on a processor are just for convenience, so you don't need a separate switch if you have a projector, for example. Nick
Last edited by WelwynNick; 2010-12-02 04:50.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9
Knows where his towel is
|
|
Knows where his towel is
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9 |
IMHO, as long as the HD621 needs LPCM audio, its going to be somewhat susceptible to jitter from the source (and maybe other unknown nasties that separate audio + video HDMI outputs may help to avoid). So I'm convinced that there's a place for a better BD player, even where only the HDMI output is used. Nick Yes, an interesting review of extensive experience. But why do you think that a twin output player will help cure problems for the HD621 in the light of what Joelc has writen: @ Asa, no, and likely for the same reasons that the Lumagen makes little/no difference in that ALL HDMI signals must contain a video stream -- albeit a "blank one"...that is, I could not tell the difference between splitting/not splitting the video audio/video stream... But I was explicitly talking about your comments about dual output players and their effect when input to the HD621, not about processors.
Asa Post
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Harmless
|
|
Harmless
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 30 |
Nick,
Thank you for your input. It�s interesting to note that through your comparisons between blu-ray players you have been able to discern a difference in quality on the audio side. I had slowly come to assume that when using a HD621 audio performance between players was effectively levelled out but clearly this is not your experience. I have never done any A/B comparisons between blu-ray players in the same set-up and thus have no first hand experience.
On a different note, I spoke to Audiocom yesterday. They were extremely helpful. They do not have a firm release date for their Oppo 93 modified unit as they�re not sure when they�ll receive OEM units from Oppo. They�ve also not finalised the specs for the modifications that they�ll be offering to these units but they�ll be similar in scope/style to what they offered on the 83 model. For Meridian HD621 users it is interesting to note that they�ll be able to offer a high spec set of modifications to those people who only plan to use the unit as a transport (i.e. you can spend zero money modifying the analogue audio circuitry and direct all of your money to modifying the circuitry that you do care about). It seems that they�re hoping to be able to offer modified units to customers in early 2011 (Jane/Feb?).
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 337
Hitchhiker
|
|
Hitchhiker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 337 |
But I was explicitly talking about your comments about dual output players and their effect when input to the 621, not about processors. Sorry, I missed the point. In general I think its best to keep audio separate to video as far as possible. HDMI makes this difficult, but I think dual outputs may help by keeping the video display / processor away from the audio processor. The benefit doesn't come from keeping digital video out of the processor; that's impossible. However, you may have the option of running the "audio" HDMI output at a different video format to the "video" output, which may optimise SQ. Of course the HD621 helps to achieve this anyway, and I expect it diminishes any benefit from a dual output player (I'm afraid I haven't tried this). I mainly want a dual output machine for use with a video processor, rather than the HD621 (which I've just sold). Video processors chip away at SQ, even the Radiance, and I'd rather it wasn't in the audio chain. Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 531
Paranoid android
|
|
Paranoid android
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 531 |
I had slowly come to assume that when using a 621 audio performance between players was effectively levelled out but clearly this is not your experience. I have never done any A/B comparisons between blu-ray players in the same set-up and thus have no first hand experience. I suspect the HD621 provides a "relative" benefit i.e. an x fold decrease re tidying up jitter rather than achieving an "absolute" level irrespective of level on the input. I'm not sure what other variables may also be add to the mix re perceived difference between HDMI sources. I guess it would be good to have some performance data re different sources and output via HDMI. Do Audiocom provide before and after measurements relating to their digital mods ? Avii
Last edited by Avii; 2010-12-03 01:54.
Life but not as we know it...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,467 Likes: 1
Working on the ultimate question
|
|
Working on the ultimate question
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,467 Likes: 1 |
I guess it would be good to have some performance data re different sources and output via HDMI. Do Audiocom provide before and after measurements relating to their digital mods? I'd be shocked if they did! I don't think I have EVER seen published measurements from these after-market mod-shops. I am inherently cynical about these things - had my BDP83 modded and it made not a lick of difference when using the unit via HDMI. I'd be curious to know what Audiocom plans to do to the unit when used as a transport - probably the usual 'we've replaced the power supply with industrial units used on Sputnik' and 'put in kryptonite shileding' ....  One of these days I really do have to try to get my hands on the CompliBlu so I can do a 1:1 comparison with my Oppo and try to detect differences for myself.
My Kit: 861v8+ID41, 800v4, UHD722, MD600, MS600, MS200, Oppo BDP-203, Genesis 201, Genesis 350 SE, Genesis S4-8 Sub, BG 520i, VTL MB450 II, Krell Showcase 7, Genesis 928 Subs, Danley DTS10 sub, SVS Ultra 16 subs.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9
Knows where his towel is
|
|
Knows where his towel is
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,941 Likes: 9 |
Sorry, I missed the point. In general I think its best to keep audio separate to video as far as possible. HDMI makes this difficult, but I think dual outputs may help by keeping the video display / processor away from the audio processor. The benefit doesn't come from keeping digital video out of the processor; that's impossible. However, you may have the option of running the "audio" HDMI output at a different video format to the "video" output, which may optimise SQ. Of course the HD621 helps to achieve this anyway, and I expect it diminishes any benefit from a dual output player (I'm afraid I haven't tried this). I mainly want a dual output machine for use with a video processor, rather than the HD621 (which I've just sold). Video processors chip away at SQ, even the Radiance, and I'd rather it wasn't in the audio chain.
Nick Thanks. That is very clear and helpful.
Asa Post
|
|
|
|
Forums18
Topics31,245
Posts297,392
Members5,503
| |
Most Online4,788 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|