Originally Posted by Bill Taylor
It's quite amusing to see Meridian being berated for not pandering to the latest "more numbers are better" marketing game.

They are the only makers of domestic kit that I know of who make some sort of acknowledgement of the work of Michael Gerzon et al who proved that you only need 3 channels to transmit 360 degree localisation information and 4 channels to transmit full spherical localisation information.

5.1 is bad enough in the inefficiency stakes but 7.1 is laughable.

Hang on a sec. I think Michael said that you can *encode* a 360-degree planar soundfield in three channels (i.e. three channel UHJ). You still need at least four speakers to reproduce it. And then as you say you can encode a spherical soundfield in 4 channels, typically either UHJ or B-Format.

Two channel UHJ as used famously by Nimbus (and decoded in most M processors) is the same as the bottom two channels of the 3 and 4 track UHJ encodes: the 3rd channel makes the planar localisation precise, and the 4th channel makes the height localisation precise - so it is a modular and downwards compatible system system. (IIRC - it's been a while.)

It was a very elegant system. Playing acoustic soundfields using 5.1 is a bit of a cludge. What a shame...

(I'm just back from a Sokolov recital, if that means anything to anyone...)


Ex-moderator
Sitting room: dCS Network Bridge, 818v3, HD621, 8kSE
Library: dCS Rossini Apex DAC/Clock, Clearaudio Performance Wood, Audio Research PH2, Mjölnir KGST, Mjölnir PureBipolar
SWMBO Room: 210, D33
Kitchen: RPi/RoonBridge, Genelec 6010 actives
Desk: Merging Anubis
Server: Roon/ROCK/NUC

Headphones: Stax SR-X9000, Stax SR-007, Stax SR-404LE, Audeze LCD-X...

Oldest audio file: 1889 Edison cylinder