|
President of the Imperial Galactic Government
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,506 Likes: 78 |
What I find interesting is that just chopping of the DIN plug at the "Product" end of an S-Lead cable and soldering on a new connector; does not make it an M-lead as there is also a difference within the DIN plug at the "DSP" end.
S-Lead DIN(5-180) has the "signal" wire connected to both pins 1 and 5. M-Lead DIN(5-180) has the "signal" wire connected to only pin 5.
Anyone know why?
I assumed pin 1 was connected or not so that the DSP could distinguish between having an M or S lead plugged in. Of course with advent of BNC comms connectors there is no scope for different wiring so may be the pin 1 connection is historical and is redundant these days and can just be omitted.
I wish I new more on how M-Comms worked, I have always assumed it is based on a "Multi Drop" serial communication standard like RS423.
Regards, Carl
861v6+ID40, HD621, 8000.2, 7200HC, 7200.2, SKYQ Silver, PS3, PDP-LX6090, QNAP TS870-Pro (8*6TB), Roon, iPadAir2. [In Reserve] C15, MD600 (2*3TB), TwinStore RM (2*2TB)
|