logo

Google Search  |  Meridian Systems  |  Meridian Streaming  |  Restaurant  |  WiKi  |  Duncan's Meridian Info  |  Board Rules  |  Restaurant Rules
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 639
Paranoid android
Paranoid android
Offline
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 639
I pretty much agree with Nick on this - I absolutely love my 5200s in my smallish condo - use 5000s for rears;

Chris - thanks for that thought; I'm thinking of that F80 for another application coming next year... may have to give one a try...

ken

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,014
Vogon Civil Servant
Vogon Civil Servant
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,014
The F80 is a superb product for both its size and its price. To use a sports analogy, it plays in plays in a division way above what you may think based on first looks.

That is can even enter the “game” or “conversation” with good floor and stand mounted speakers, speaks to how well it plays music from CD`s and many DVD-A`s. (Video is very average IMHO)

However, as someone who owns (and has compared it with) D5200`s, there really is a big difference. To continue with the above sports analogy, the F80 deserves to be in the game, but the D5200`s would be superior in every area of the pitch and would end out winning the game by quite a convincing margin. Having owned 96/24 D5k`s previously, I can tell you that the same would still hold thru for the D5k`s. Not as convincing a win perhaps, but still a win

Only in a room with Severe positioning issues (of the type that Joel mentioned above) would the F80 make for a better solution. In all other situations, the D5200`s or 2nd hand D5k`s would make for better sounding music

The above comments relate to comparing an F80 with a stereo pair. If you are looking for Surround from Movies, then the comments apply even more

One other thing to try is a different amplifier with your B&W`s. In the main, I think that B&W produce excellent sounding speakers, but finding the “right” amplification to partner them with can be an issue. And unfortunately, the “right” amplification can vary by B&W speaker and, most importantly, by room type and size. This avenue may also be worth exploring, but it could end out in a lot of trial and error

Good luck



Last edited by RHurley; 2007-12-08 08:53.

-
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733
Likes: 88
Don't Panic!
Don't Panic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733
Likes: 88
Agreed. It wasn't clear when I posted that Chris wanted surround. We crossed posts. The F80 is not going to be a substitute for a fully blown DSP surround system. I'd love a pair of 5200s... Well, three actually!


Roon Developer and ex-moderator of this Forum
I am #25 in the HH1 photo of fame.
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 254
Hitchhiker
Hitchhiker
Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 254
Chris

Here's a list of things that helped me cope with harsh treble/digital glare in my system:

1. Squash balls.
I have squash balls under all my components. Rubber emphasizes the bass, points emphasize the treble. B&Q sell rubber furniture castor cups to stop your settee feet marking the carpet, they are just the right size to hold squash balls.

2. Power conditioning.
I use a 'balanced' power conditioner, it significantly reduces glare and treble harshness.

3. Cables.
A thorny topic but it works for me. I never imagined cables would make a difference until Tony from Coherent Systems came a demo'd a bunch of different cables in my system. Some were better than others, copper and silver sound different, alloys sound different again and screened cables seemed to lower the noise floor. Give them a try, the worst that can happen is they make no difference and you can cross them off your list of things to try.

4. Clearlight Audio Supper Position Platforms
They use RDC (Resonant Damping Compound) worth a try, I use them instead of glass on my Mana stands. Glass tends to emphasize glare and treble.

5. Speaker Crossover
Not for the faint hearted but if you're handy with a soldering iron you can solder a couple of bypass caps across your tweeters to reduce the treble. I started off with about 200nf and worked down from there. If you buy a range of cheap caps from Maplins it will allow you to combine them to get to the right value to just take the 'edge' off the treble.

Regards
Gary

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 19
Pan-dimensional being
Pan-dimensional being
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 19
thanks all. Surround is important so the f80 is out. The d5200s look great. I could tinker withcables etc but I'm not sure I'd get the sound I want. Perhaps the outlay would be worth it for the right speakers.

As an aside what does mrc do and would it help me any?


Chris
Srces: Wiim Pro | OSMC Vero 4K+
Procs: HD621 > G61R > Minidsp DDRC-88D
Spkrs: 7200.2 + 5KC + 5Ks | iNuke6K > USC15 | iNuke3K > 2 x Crowson T108SS
Video: JVC HD950 & 1.9m React3 2.4:1 screen
Room: 5.8x2.8m | Various GIK Panels
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 254
Hitchhiker
Hitchhiker
Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 254
sns

I think Stillpoints would be more effective than apples or oranges. Like any other piece of hi-fi equipment the G68 has capacitors in it which are microphonic and therefore change their capacitance in tune with the vibrations from the music if you don't have effective resonance control. Squashballs work in a similar manner to Stillpoints and dampen resonance reducing the effects of microphony.


Regards
Gary


Last edited by GaryG; 2007-12-08 23:37.
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,364
Likes: 14
President of the Imperial Galactic Government
President of the Imperial Galactic Government
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,364
Likes: 14
Gary,

G68 DACs are not used with his DSP5200's

Have you tried Meridian DSPs? No squash balls required !

Cables either transmit the signal correctly or they color it. So when hunting for cables are you hunting for the perfect cable or one that colors it to your taste?


- Fiddler (IMHO)

If you think listening to music is fun, try learning an instrument.
HT: G61RSL, 4x5K, 5.5KHC, 2xSC6000, Transporter, HD621, Philips BDP7501 4K, Tivo, 65" LG OLED 4K C6
Computer: Foobar2000, 5K, Mojo, HiFiMan HE1000 V2
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 19
Pan-dimensional being
Pan-dimensional being
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 19
ok a pair of 5200s represents a significant investment on my part. I guess I'm unlikely to see them on the s/h market yet. So lets talk about D5ks... aside from the aesthetic disadvantage (the 5200s look really good!), what are we talking about in terms of performance between 5ks and 5200s?


Chris
Srces: Wiim Pro | OSMC Vero 4K+
Procs: HD621 > G61R > Minidsp DDRC-88D
Spkrs: 7200.2 + 5KC + 5Ks | iNuke6K > USC15 | iNuke3K > 2 x Crowson T108SS
Video: JVC HD950 & 1.9m React3 2.4:1 screen
Room: 5.8x2.8m | Various GIK Panels
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733
Likes: 88
Don't Panic!
Don't Panic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733
Likes: 88
Lots (edit) unfortunately...

Last edited by VirusKiller; 2007-12-09 10:53.

Roon Developer and ex-moderator of this Forum
I am #25 in the HH1 photo of fame.
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 254
Hitchhiker
Hitchhiker
Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 254
George

The criteria for deciding whether a component suffers from michrophony isn't just because it's digital.

With regard to DSP speakers, the last time I demo'd the G68 it was with 8000's. If I was buying on looks then the 8000's would be top of my list, but I'm not sure about the performance, they didn't sound as good as I was expecting, and certainly not as good as my analogue system.

I'm moving into a smaller house in the new year and will have to part with most of my kit due to space restrictions so the simplicity and WAF of DSP speakers may be an option.

Regards
Gary

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 220
Hitchhiker
Hitchhiker
Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 220
Hi Chris,

Here's a pair of ex-demo 5200s in rosewood I spotted while on a wish-list surf a while ago...
Cheers,

Ed.


G91, G68, 5x DSP33, SW1600, HD621.
Red F80 and dock.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 639
Paranoid android
Paranoid android
Offline
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 639
Originally Posted by Chris Geary
ok a pair of 5200s represents a significant investment on my part. I guess I'm unlikely to see them on the s/h market yet. So lets talk about D5ks... aside from the aesthetic disadvantage (the 5200s look really good!), what are we talking about in terms of performance between 5ks and 5200s?

I agree with VK - significant performance differences (5200 vs 5K); Although I would caution against getting caught up in the upgrade-itous disease. Instead compare how a given purchase will change your existing situation relative to your available budget. The 5Ks are wonderful DSPs with a great sound for smaller rooms and can be had on the used market fairly regularly (from those disease infected).

I personally like the straight line look of the 5Ks - They also have a very neutral tonal quality (to my ears) - which means if you later upgrade to something else, the 5K rears will likely work for most any new DSP fronts you may get.

If you can (or choose to) afford the 5200s, go for it; But if not, the 5Ks (get the 24/96) are a great $ value / DSP sound today IMO...

ken

Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Carl, Duncs, ncpl 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
4 members (Gemeni, Adam Schaefer, CMB Integrations - Bruce, Andy123456), 770 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Kiran1103, Tony999, PhilP, Grover, Humberto
5,503 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
AngryGM 11
Top Posters
VirusKiller 12,733
ncpl 8,816
Carl 8,506
Fiddler 8,364
Ian 7,950
Forum Statistics
Forums18
Topics31,230
Posts297,323
Members5,503
Most Online4,788
May 22nd, 2026
Meridian  |  Media Centre  |  Support  |  Firmware Release Notes  |  RSS Systems  |  RSS Streaming  |  RSS Restaurant

Website Provided by Mr Tech Guy - Resolute Audio Visual Limited © 2026

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Release build 20251126)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.5.12 Page Time: 0.100s Queries: 40 (0.058s) Memory: 0.8944 MB (Peak: 2.2167 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-10-25 16:11:22 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS