logo

Google Search  |  Meridian Systems  |  Meridian Streaming  |  Restaurant  |  WiKi  |  Duncan's Meridian Info  |  Board Rules  |  Restaurant Rules
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#30433 2005-07-04 20:51
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 27
Harmless
Harmless
Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 27
2 ch stereo only.
The G91 plays CDs rather well - particularly the CD layer of SACDs. eg. Barb Junger - Elvis songs (Linn). I'm finding the CD layer quality and listener-satisfaction way ahead of any DVD-Audio I've played (rather lifeless (often multi-mono) sound).

Anyone using a SACD player hooked into Meridian gear?

The SACD player has to match the G91 in quality.
so what's the minimum quality required ?
For example, some of the cheapest universal players reprocess SACD as PCM and will probably not do. Pioneer, Denon or Marantz ?
Have SONY really stopped releasing new SACDs ?

#30434 2005-07-05 03:51
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 78
Mostly harmless
Mostly harmless
Offline
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 78
Conan,
You've really got two choices:

1) Use a regular SACD player and connect it's analog outputs to your G68 / 861 with IA45.

or

2) Get/Mod a player from DVD upgrades. See:

http://www.dvdupgrades.ch/150019/Modification/SPDIF/Output/Six_channel_S_P_DIF_output_board.html

Option 2 will likely result in better sound by avoiding DA-AD. Those who've tried both options seem to agree.

Personally I've not found SACD players that convert DSD to PCM before conversion (& there are plenty of expensive ones that do) to necessarily sound inferior - and this is directly into analog amps.

This, of course, begs the question 'why not start with PCM?'...Which is a very good question. wink

Bottom line is that if you experience something special with direct DSD conversion then go with a player that does not convert to PCM - & certainly don't connect to a Meridian processor. Otherwise go with options 1 or 2 (better) above and enjoy - IMO - the more substantial/real benefits of MRC etc.

Paul.

#30435 2005-07-05 20:59
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 338
Hitchhiker
Hitchhiker
Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 338
The very good reason for DSD is copyright protection. Does anybody knows someone who has ripped into MP4 some DSD datastreams?

I personally like SACD, it sounds analogue, and I would have the quator of dCS gear if I could afford it.

#30436 2005-07-06 09:00
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 233
Hitchhiker
Hitchhiker
Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 233
i just can tell you that my sony dvp-9000es (1500$ DVD/SACD player) sounds on SACD better than G-08 on RBCD.

hopy this helps.

#30437 2005-07-06 13:24
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 517
Paranoid android
Paranoid android
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 517
G08 playing RBCD against Denon A11 (I think it's 5900 in the states) playing SACD [titles from the same stereo masters like Stevie Ray Vaughan - Texas Flood, Bucky Pizzarelli - Swing Live or Diana Krall - Love Scenes, comparing stereo PCM from RBCD to stereo DSD from SACD] -compared those many times and it's a very hard call. My option would go (on a quite thin margin) to the G08+RBCD. Same amplification, same speakers, inputs with gain adjusted to compensate for level, A/B switching. Would also note that G08 is interconected on XLR with the preamp while the A11 goes in unbalanced.

Just a personal take on this matter. But maybe my ears are getting old.


M kit : G08 502 557 507 2xDSP5k
#30438 2005-07-06 14:07
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,606
Great Green Arkleseizure
Great Green Arkleseizure
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,606
fbourgoin asks:
Quote
The very good reason for DSD is copyright protection. Does anybody knows someone who has ripped into MP4 some DSD datastreams?
You can't directly rip the datastream. You'd have to sample an analog input, or get a player modified by DVD Upgrades and use that output at 24/88.2K to rip the data.

Quote
I personally like SACD, it sounds analogue, and I would have the quator of dCS gear if I could afford it.
I think the hype dramatically exceeds the sound quality for SA-CD.

When you couple that with the complete inability to perform native signal processing (everything involves multi-bit intermediates) its appeal due to the "purity" of DSD becomes more and more limited.

Anyway, that's just my opinion on the topic. I own a player that was modified by DVD Upgrades because I like surround music, and this was the best sounding path to me for SA-CD.

Cheers,


Surround Music Fan/Computer Geek/Curmudgeon in training.
---
861v4, HD621, Panasonic BD-P55K, Toshiba HD-A35, Oppo HD990, Dish Network 622, Pioneer DV-668AV-S w/ DVD Upgrades mod, EW Fontaine II (x5), Velodyne DD-15 (x2), Seymour AV Ice blocks (x7)
#30439 2005-07-07 07:38
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 1
Working on the ultimate question
Working on the ultimate question
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 1
SACD is a flawed format. Search the web, lots of commentary on it.

92KHz/24bit PCM is all (and probably more than) we need.

Mark

#30440 2005-07-07 13:03
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 44
Mostly harmless
Mostly harmless
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 44
Quote
Originally posted by Mark_H:
SACD is a flawed format. Search the web, lots of commentary on it.

92KHz/24bit PCM is all (and probably more than) we need.

Mark
I think you could apply that to every hi-def format.

Other than hifi enthusiasts (of which we make a very small percentage)most folks are happy with 44Khz/16bit. Have to say I'm pretty happy with it too. I do not claim to have golden ears.

#30441 2005-07-07 16:01
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 338
Hitchhiker
Hitchhiker
Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 338
JK,
I agree I might even go through the same dvdupgrade that you did for SACD but, my comment was more for 2Ch Hirez music, I've got more and more SACDs now (all hybrids obviously because I don't own a player yet), I guess it depends on the music you listen to, if you are a Classical Music or Jazz fan than I guess SACD can get you spending a bit on discs, the same isn't true for DVDAs.
dCS gear was for me the best experience of 2Ch music playback, I haven't listen to Meitner rigs, but clearly better than M,Wadia, or Cello which my other Digital references.

#30442 2005-07-08 05:21
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 27
Harmless
Harmless
Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 27
Thanks everyone.
We all enjoy listening to new music - preferably as a high quality recording as the new (digital) technology promises. Unfortunately this is not happening widely. All my SACD purchases (as CD replay only) sound great. DVD_Audio quality - crap to OK. Vinyl gives something digital can't manage so far (via a Thorens 2030). So I'm thinking the only way I'm going to enjoy high-quality new recordings is going to be via SACD.
The Marantz 8400 SACD looks interesting - add in a valve preamp, and the G91 into the valve preamp in transport mode might just be the answer ?!

I've tried running the G91 into some transistor preamps but the sound quality was much the same.

thanks again people!


Moderated by  Carl, Duncs, ncpl 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
3 members (Mr Meridian, Fanshawe, MalcolmW), 1,234 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Kiran1103, Tony999, PhilP, Grover, Humberto
5,503 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Ludwig 10
AngryGM 10
Top Posters
VirusKiller 12,733
ncpl 8,816
Carl 8,506
Fiddler 8,364
Ian 7,950
Forum Statistics
Forums18
Topics31,244
Posts297,381
Members5,503
Most Online4,788
May 22nd, 2026
Meridian  |  Media Centre  |  Support  |  Firmware Release Notes  |  RSS Systems  |  RSS Streaming  |  RSS Restaurant

Website Provided by Mr Tech Guy - Resolute Audio Visual Limited © 2026

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Release build 20251126)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.5.12 Page Time: 0.057s Queries: 34 (0.025s) Memory: 0.8744 MB (Peak: 2.2177 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-11-03 10:10:07 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS