|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 24
Harmless
|
|
Harmless
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 24 |
Just wondering if there are any actual reviews out yet, or if anyone has any thoughts on them or how they compare to what I presume is the next step up the ladder- the DSP5200s.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,036
Pan-dimensional being
|
|
Pan-dimensional being
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,036 |
They look very much like DSP3100HC's without a display. I wonder if they're effectively the same in performance ?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,140 Likes: 24
Hooloovoo
|
|
Hooloovoo
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,140 Likes: 24 |
They are basically the same height and depth as a DSP5200HC but about 7 inches narrower. That is actually quite large, still not as big as the old DSP5000C but the drivers look about the same size.
In the spirit of Spinaltap, I would like to confirm that I am not involved in the corrupt theft of a global sport.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88
Don't Panic!
|
|
Don't Panic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88 |
I had no idea they were so big, yet the 7 inches narrower unfortunately makes them a candidate for my living room 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,036
Pan-dimensional being
|
|
Pan-dimensional being
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,036 |
Interesting that they weigh 5 Kg less than a DSP3100HC
.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88
Don't Panic!
|
|
Don't Panic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,733 Likes: 88 |
I had no idea they were so big, yet the 7 inches narrower unfortunately makes them a candidate for my living room  Completely misread the previous post. I thought it said 5200, not 5200HC...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 24
Harmless
|
|
Harmless
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 24 |
|
|
|
|
1 members (Ludwig),
1,091
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums18
Topics31,243
Posts297,377
Members5,503
| |
Most Online4,788 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|