That's a Chicken and Egg scenario. I think the music files have to be available first to stimulate demand for decoding solutions. As the files are backward compatible and supposed to sound, perhaps, better than CD they should be getting on with the massive task of transcoding ASAP IMHO.
Chris
No 18 in the Hall of fame I have simple tastes; I am content to settle for the best: GIK monster bass panels, rear wall. QNAP TVS 471i3. Roon into DSP5200SE via 210/ 218 zone... Explorer 2. Bluesound Pulse 2, Mini & Flex. 596v1, 518, Foxsat HD, Sony BDP, Pioneer 5090, 2 Chromecast's for LRB videos. MS200 to F80 for a Roon zone
But there is no hardware currently commercially available to decode MQA.
As I understand MQA, it isn't a format that requires new decode (end user) hardware. Instead, it is delivery format (FLAC, etc.) independent. Its focus seems to be on capturing the original content better than other sampling and encoding methods. The result is included in exisiting container format.
Originally Posted by Meridian
MQA also uses innovative lossless processing to build a file or stream which also delivers sophisticated metadata: details of the recording, instructions for the decoder and D/A converters plus how to create an authenticated exact reconstruction of the original analogue signal. MQA can be delivered inside any lossless container, e.g. as ALAC, FLAC, or WAV
That is step three of the four step diagram you refer to, step four is the decode which is required to extract the MQA data, although the MQA encoded file will play perfectly without the decoder you just won't get the MQA version, decoding MQA as it says will be able to be done via sw or hw.
Russ
Last edited by Carl; 2015-03-2600:02. Reason: Redundant quotation removed
Yeah, you're right; I was thinking that an existing FLAC, etc., decoder would require no additional modifications, but that doesn't seem right, does it? So perhaps those decoders will have to be updated for MQA. Seems like it would be an easy software patch. Or firmware, if devices are doing it in hardware. Otherwise, why bother sticking to existing containers for the content delivery?
I may attend this event, held by my dealer, where I can learn more. . .or attend just because it sounds cool. . .
Last edited by Gumby; 2015-03-2600:04.
Control:10 (died) | Ensemble #1 (died) | Ensemble #2 (zones: 4 analog, 1 digital) | Intel NUC running ROCK | DSP3100 | F80 | migrating to Roon with multiple 218 Zone Controllers
Ken Forsythe gave a technical overview of the MQA technology last night in NYC to a few Hitchhikers. The result of some recently discovered medical research that explained why 24/192 digital audio files sounded 'better' and 24/384 sounded ever-so-slightly better led to a better understanding of the psychoacoustics of timing as opposed to frequency. Meridian built an encoder/decoder that allowed them to summarize the musical parts of the audio stream and hide data under the 'noise floor'.
Ken said last night that while the primary focus was on increasing the fidelity of convenient streamable audio, digital MQA files would eventually be sold on sites such as HDtracks, and because of the properties of the metadata, they can be downloaded faster & cheaper, authenticated, with very high fidelity (assuming they are decoded in HW or SW by a MQA capable DAC or SW library).
No 18 in the Hall of fame I have simple tastes; I am content to settle for the best: GIK monster bass panels, rear wall. QNAP TVS 471i3. Roon into DSP5200SE via 210/ 218 zone... Explorer 2. Bluesound Pulse 2, Mini & Flex. 596v1, 518, Foxsat HD, Sony BDP, Pioneer 5090, 2 Chromecast's for LRB videos. MS200 to F80 for a Roon zone